In April, the Swedish Market Court ruled that telecom operator TeliaSonera engaged in margin squeeze in the broadband market during the period April 2000–January 2003. The judgement upheld a previous judgement by the Stockholm District Court made in December 2011 and was widely expected to. However, the Market Court’s decision substantially reduced the severity of the imposed fines due to the competition authority failing to satisfy the burden of proof. As professor Lars Henriksson (CELEC’s Vice Chairman) explains, this raises a number interesting legal questions and precedents related to the standard of proof in Swedish competition law cases.
- Analysis as a solid foundation for decision-making
- Study of the effects of mergers and acquisitions in the retail market for gasoline in Sweden
- The Global Merger Control Index 2014
- Private enforcement of competition law and consumer redress in Sweden
- The Swedish Market Court Rules in an Important Margin Squeezing Case Involving TeliaSonera
- 86Terrie on Study of the effects of mergers and acquisitions in the retail market for gasoline in Sweden
- 76Kathy on Towards Technology Neutral Regulation of Public Service Broadcasting in Sweden?
- DinaX on Study of the effects of mergers and acquisitions in the retail market for gasoline in Sweden
- hack coins by agario mods on The Global Merger Control Index 2014
- Barnegat auto insureance on Market Expectations of End-user Electricity Prices in Sweden 2013-2018